Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Miraben Raghunath Champat & 4 ­S

High Court Of Gujarat|23 March, 2012
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and award dated 04.09.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal [Aux.], Jamnagar in M.A.C.P. No.951/1999, whereby the said claim petition was partly allowed and the original claimants were awarded total compensation of Rs.94,000/­ along with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of the application till its realization and proportionate costs.
2. The above claim petition came to be filed in respect of the vehicular accident that took place on 24.10.1999, in which Raghunath Champat expired, while he was travelling along with goods in a Rickshaw (chhakda) bearing registration No. GJ­10­T­ 9811 insured with the appellant­Insurance Company.
3. The main contention raised on behalf of the appellant­Insurance Company is that deceased was travelling as unauthorized passenger in a 'goods vehicle' and therefore, no liability of making payment of compensation could be saddled upon the Insurance Company. In support of the above submission, reliance has been placed on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Ramesh Kumar v. National Insurance Co.
Ltd. & Ors. (2001) 6 SCC 713.
4. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. It appears from the record that the vehicle in which the deceased was travelling at the time of accident was a 'goods vehicle'. Under the provisions of the M.V. Act. the Insurance Company of a 'goods vehicle' cannot be fastened with the liability of making payment of compensation, if any injury is caused or death takes place while travelling in such vehicle. Considering the facts of the case and the principle rendered in Ramesh Kumar's case (supra), the Insurance Company cannot be held liable to make payment of compensation.
5. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is allowed. The impugned common judgment and award passed by the Tribunal is quashed and set aside only qua the extent of imposition of liability upon the appellant­Insurance Company to make payment of compensation. It is, however, observed that if the amount deposited before the Tribunal is already withdrawn by the original claimants, the same shall not be recovered from the original claimants but, the appellant­Insurance Company shall be at liberty to recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle. If the amount has not been withdrawn by the original claimants, the same shall be refunded to the Insurance Company and the claimants shall be at liberty to recover the balance amount from the owner of the offending vehicle. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs.
[K.S. JHAVERI, J.]
/phalguni/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Miraben Raghunath Champat & 4 ­S

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
23 March, 2012
Judges
  • Ks Jhaveri
Advocates
  • Mr Dakshesh Mehta