Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Mintoo @ Jagdish Gupta And Others vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 65
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 24984 of 2007 Applicant :- Mintoo @ Jagdish Gupta And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Adarsh Kumar,B.N.Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Rajeev Tiwari,V.S. Chauhan
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
List revised.
None appears for the applicant.
The applicant is represented by two counsel one of whom (Sri Adarsh Kumar, learned Advocate) has sent an illness slip. The other counsel Sri B.N. Rai, learned Advocate has neither appeared nor any adjournment has been sought in the matter.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.10.2021 S.Chaurasia
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mintoo @ Jagdish Gupta And Others vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 October, 2021
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • Adarsh Kumar B N Rai

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.