IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019 BEFORE BETWEEN:
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA REVIEW PETITION No.148/2018 IN WRIT PETITION No.41069/2014(GM-CPC) M/S. MILLENNIUM POINT GROUND FLOOR, NO.94/3-1, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI. P. MOHAMMED SHANI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI M. C. RAVI KUMAR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1. M/S. K. M. AKBAR TRUST NO. 94/3, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001, REP. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE, MS. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE K. M. AKBAR.
2. M/S. SHAKTHI ENTERPRISES A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, NO.94/3, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001, ALSO HAVING OFFICE AT NO.3156, 12TH MAIN, HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 038, REP. BY ITS PARTNERS.
2(i) SMT. VASANTHI K. ALVA, W/O. SRI. P. K. ALVA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 2(ii) SRI. KIRNA ALVA, S/O. SANTHA ALVA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 2(iii) SMT. VRINDA K. ALVA, W/O. KIRAN ALVA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 2(iv) SRI. VIJAY KRISHNA K. ALVA, S/O. P.K. ALVA, AGED 42 YEARS, ... RESPONDENTS … THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 22/03/2017 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO. 41069/2014(GM-CPC), ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER This Court by the order dated 2.11.2018 finally granted one week’s time to comply with the office objections. Again on 4.12.2018 two weeks’ time was granted and on 20.2.2019, finally one week’s time was granted for compliance of office objections. On 26.3.2019 since none appeared for the petitioner, the matter was adjourned by one week. On the last occasion i.e., on 4.4.2019 as none appeared, the matter was directed to be posted on 8.4.2019.
2. Today also though called twice in the pre-lunch session as well as post-lunch session, none appears for the review petitioner. Even the review petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the review petition. Accordingly, review petition is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections.
Sd/- Judge Nsu/-