The petitioner Sangam made an application, for service connection for agricultural purpose. By the impugned order, it was rejected on the ground that the petitioner has not produced 'No objection Certificate' and not feasible as per the relevant Government Order.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the service connection sought for is only for agricultural purpose for the well, whereas the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that it is meant for taking water from the River Cauvery.
4.This is a disputed question of facts, which cannot be gone into. Suffice, it is to state that the petitioner purchased a large extent of land by forming an association. As the petitioner has not been put on notice, this Court without going into the merits of the case, set aside the order impugned.
5.Accordingly, the order impugned is set aside and the writ petition is allowed. The respondent No.4 is directed to hear the petitioner and thereafter, take a decision. The respondent No.4 is directed to conclude the enquiry within a period of six(6) weeks of the receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
23.03.2017 maya/abr Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking order / Non-speaking order To
1. The Chairman Cum Managing Director, X floor, NPKKR Maligai, 144, Anna Salai, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Chennai - 600 002.
M.M.SUNDRESH, J.
maya/abr
2. The Chief Engineer, Planning and Resources Centre, VI floor, Eastern Wing, NPKKR Maligai, 144, Anna Salai, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Chennai - 600 002.
3. The Superintendeing Engineer, Gobi Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Chennai - 600 002.
4. The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Gobi Distribution Circle, Uratchikottai, Bhavani - 638 202.
WRIT PETITION No.672 of 2017 23.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in