Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Meraj Akhtar And Other vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|05 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 7948 of 2021 Applicant :- Meraj Akhtar And 2 Other Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Azim Ahmad Kazmi,Khurshed Alam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Azim Ahmad Kazmi, learned counsel for applicants and learned A.G.A. for State.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicants Meraj Akhtar, Moin Akhtar and Smt. Anjum Ansari, in connection with Case Crime No. 53 of 2020, under sections 498A, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Mahila Thana, District Deoria.
Having heard learned counsel for parties and upon perusal of material brought record as well as complicity of the accused and also judgement of Apex Court in P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019, SC 4198, this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr. P. C.
Accordingly, present application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 5.4.2021 HSM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Meraj Akhtar And Other vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
05 April, 2021
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Azim Ahmad Kazmi Khurshed Alam