Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Memnabibi vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|29 March, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Endorsement on the Board indicates that respondent No.11 could not be served as the said respondent is stated to have expired.
Mr.Asit B.Joshi, learned advocate for respondents Nos.3 to 10, submits that he has given the details of the heirs and legal representatives of the deceased respondent to the learned advocate for the petitioners.
The learned advocate for the petitioners may take steps to bring on record the heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent No.11. List on 30-4-2012.
(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari,J) arg Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Memnabibi vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
29 March, 2012

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.