[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the records relating to the detention order passed in C.No.02/PBMMSEC Act/IS/2017 dated 18.05.2017, against the detenu by name, S.Anwar @ Anwar Basha, aged 39 years, S/o.Sulthan Sha, residing at Door No.12-A/17, 3rd Street, Lakshmi Nagar, Nallamapalayam, Coimbatore and quash the same.
2. The Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies Criminal Investigation Department, Coimbatore, as Sponsoring Authority, has submitted an affidavit to the Detaining Authority, wherein it is averred that the detenu has involved in the following adverse cases:
i) Pollachi Civil Supplies Criminal Investigation Department, Crime No.81 of 2016, registered under Section 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w.7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act 1955;
ii) Pollachi Civil Supplies Criminal Investigation Department, Crime No.114 of 2016, registered under Section 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w.7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act 1955;
iii)Pollachi Civil Supplies Criminal Investigation Department, Crime No.386 of 2016, registered under Section 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w.7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act 1955;
iv)Pollachi Civil Supplies Criminal Investigation Department, Crime No.137 of 2017, registered under Section 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w.7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act 1955; and
v) Pollachi Civil Supplies Criminal Investigation Department, Crime No.138 of 2017, registered under Section 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w.7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act 1955.
3. Further it is averred that on 01.05.2017, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies Criminal Investigation Department, Coimbatore and other police constables have watched smuggling of rice in the place of occurrence. At that time, they noticed a person with 15 bags of PDS rice and he has been enquired and ultimately he admitted his guilt. Consequently, a case has been registered in Crime No.99 of 2017 under Sections 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w.7(1)(a)(ii) of EC Act, 1955 and ultimately requested the Detaining Authority to invoke the Prevention of Blackmarketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 (Central Act 7 of 1980) against the detenu.
4. The Detaining Authority, after perusing the averments made in the affidavit and other connected materials, has derived a subjective satisfaction to the effect that the detenu is a habitual offender and ultimately, branded him as Black Marketer by way of passing the impugned Detention Order and in order to quash the same, the present petition has been filed by the mother of the detenu, as petitioner.
5.In the counter filed on the side of the respondents, it is averred that most of the averments made in the petition are false. The Sponsoring Authority has submitted all the relevant materials to the Detaining Authority and the Detaining Authority, after considering the materials supplied to him and other connected materials, has derived a subjective satisfaction to the effect that the detenu is habitual offender and has rightly branded him as Black Marketer by way of passing the impugned Detention Order and the same does not call for any interference and therefore, the present petition deserves to be dismissed.
6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has contended that on the side of the detenu, a representation dated 19.05.2017 has been submitted, but so far the same has not been disposed of and therefore, the detention order in question is liable to be quashed.
7. On the side of the respondents, a proforma has been submitted, wherein, it is seen that on 19.05.2017 a representation has been submitted on the side of the detenu, but so far the same has not been disposed of by the concerned authorities. The same would affect the rights of the detenu guaranteed under
Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India and therefore, the Detention Order in question is liable to be quashed.
8. In fine, this Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the Detention Order dated 18.05.2017 passed in Memo C.No.02/PBMMSEC Act/IS/2017 by the second respondent against the detenu by name, S.Anwar @ Anwar Basha, aged 39 years, S/o.Sulthan Sha, is quashed and directed to set him at liberty forthwith unless he is required to be incarcerated in any other case.