Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Meghraj Singh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|20 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45700 of 2021 Applicant :- Meghraj Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Madan Ji Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mohd. Aslam,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has been further argued that as per prosecution version it is alleged that on 1.1.2014, the alleged applicant and three other co-accused came to the house of complainant and asked him to invest the money and the same was invested regularly during the period from 3.1.2014 to 2.1.2019 at the rate of Rs.3000/- per six months in the insurance company namely Pearl Plus Infra Ventures Limited bearing Registration No.U70102UP2013 PLC 056600. It has been further argued that the dispute arose between the son of applicant namely Mahkar Singh and Devendra Singh (Branch Manager of the said insurance company) after demand of money by the applicant, which was received by the informant and the first information report was lodged. It has been further argued that the applicant is old person aged about 70 years and his son was working as employee in the insurance company in which he has no concerned with the same. It has been further argued that the applicant is languishing in jail since 20.9.2021 having no criminal history and that in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will co-operate with the trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of evidence and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Meghraj Singh involved in Case Crime No.0401 of 2019, under Sections 420, 506, 323 I.P.C. & 3(1)(d) of SC/ST Act, Police Station- Hasanpur, District- Amroha, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail in accordance with law.
The party may file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by pairokar of the applicant.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 20.12.2021 Anil K. Sharma
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Meghraj Singh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
20 December, 2021
Judges
  • Mohd Aslam
Advocates
  • Madan Ji Pandey