IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO.29682/2016 (GM - CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. MEERA T. SHETTY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, W/O. THARANATH SHETTY, KUNJARPA HOUSE, UJIRE VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT – 574 240.
2. SMT. SHASHIKALA J. SHETTY AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, W/O. JAYARAM SHETTY, KEMBARJE HOUSE, BELAL ROAD, UJIRE VILLAGE AND POST, D.K. DISTRICT – 574 240. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI THARANATH SHETTY K., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. VAMANA BENDE, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O. KESHAVA BENDE, ‘SHRINIDHI’ STORES, UJIRE TOWN, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT – 574 214.
2. MAHESH SHETTY THIMARODI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O. VITTAL SHETTY, THIMARODI HOUSE, UJIRE VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT – 574 240.
3. MANOJ KUNJARPA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, S/O. MAHABALA, KUNJARPA HOUSE, UJIRE VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT – 574 240.
4. JAYADEVA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O. SHESHAPPA GOWDA, VIDYANAGAR, KUNJARPA HOUSE, UJIRE VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT-574 240.
5. PREETHAM SHETTY AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O. LATE PADMANABHA, KUNJARPA HOUSE, UJIRE VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT – 574 240. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI P. KARUNAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-2; SRI KETHAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-4; SRI BHASKAR HOLLA, ADVOCATE FOR R-5 (COPY SERVED BEFORE TRIAL COURT); R-4 AND R-5 – SERVICE OF NOTICE HELD SUFFICIENT V/O. DATED 04/10/2016; R-3 – SERVED UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 28.04.2016 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE, BELTHANGADY, D.K., DISTRICT ON I.A.NO.3 IN M.A.6/2015 AT ANNEXURE-A BY ALLOWING THE APPLICATION IN I.A.NO.3 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 28/04/2016 on I.A.No.3 in M.A.No.6/2015 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge at Belthangady, D.K. District ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said M.A.No.6/2015 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE S*