IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.44108/2015(GM-CPC) BETWEEN SMT. MEERA BAI D/O LATE APPANNA RAO JADAV AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO.4, ADI KABEER ASHRAM ROAD, 2ND MAIN, 6TH CROSS, R T NAGAR POST, MOTHI NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560032 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI C SHIVA SHANKAR, ADVOCATE) AND 1. SRI. VITTOBA RAO S/O LATE APPANNA RAO JADAV AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT NO.19, ITI EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO -OPERATIVE SOCIETY K G BYDARAHALLI BANGALORE - 560016 2. SRI ESHWAR RAO JADAV S/O LATE APPANNA RAO JADAV AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT NO.58, 1ST STAGE, GAYATHRIPURAM MYSORE - 11 3. SRI ASHWATHNARAYANA RAO JADAV S/O LATE APPANNA RAO JADAV AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT NO 7, GROUND FLOOR 1ST CROSS, RAJAPPA BLOCK, J C NAGAR BANGALORE - 560066 4. SRI SHASHIDHAR RAO JADAV S/O LATE APPANNA RAO JADAV AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT NO.6, 3RD MAIN, GANESHA BLOCK SULTHANPALYA R T NAGAR POST BANGALORE - 560032 5. SRI VENKOBA RAO JADAV S/O LATE APPANNA RAO JADAV AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT NO 7, 1ST FLOOR 1ST CROSS, RAJAPPA BLOCK J C NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560006 ... RESPONDENTS (R4 IS SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 6.9.2015 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE XX ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JDUGE AT BANGALORE CITY IN O.S.NO.4051/2010 ON I.A.NO.7 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER AS PRAYED.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Plaintiff in O.S.No.4051/2010 on the file of the XX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, has come up in this writ petition impugning the order dated 16.9.2015 passed on IA.No.7.
2. When this matter is taken up for consideration this day, the stage of the original proceedings in O.S.No.4051/2010 is looked into in the e-courts website of Bengaluru District. On going through the same, it is seen that O.S.No.4051/2010 has already been disposed of on merits by judgment dated 5.11.2016. Therefore, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition as the same has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE nd/-