Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39937 of 2021 Applicant :- Meenu @ Meenua Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Dadhi Bal Yadav,Radha Krishna Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Shri Dadhi Bal Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State.
A first information report was lodged as Case Crime No.98 of 2021 at Police Station-Jahanabad, District- Fatehpur under Sections 272 I.P.C. and Section 60(2) of Excise Act.
The bail application of the applicant was rejected by learned Special Judge (ST/SC Act), Fatehpur, on 07.09.2021.
The applicant is in jail since 01.09.2021, pursuant to the said F.I.R.
Shri Dadhi Bal Yadav, learned counsel for applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. As per the prosecution case illicit liquor, Urea manure and alum were recovered from the applicant. The applicant has no concern with the aforesaid items. The recovered items were planted on the person of the applicant to frame her in the instant case to show proficiency of police investigators. There is no independent witness or public witness to the alleged recovery. Apart from this case, the applicant does not have any criminal history. Lastly it is contended by the learned counsel for applicant that the applicant shall not abscond and will fully cooperate in the criminal law proceedings. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence nor influence the witnesses in any manner.
Shri Rishi Chaddha learned AGA for the State could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. Learned AGA does not dispute the fact that the applicant does not have any criminal history.
Courts have taken notice of the overcrowding of jails during the current pandemic situation (Ref.: Suo Motu Writ Petition (c) No. 1/2020, Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in prisons before the Supreme Court of India). These circumstances shall also be factored in while considering bail applications on behalf of accused persons.
I see merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant and hold that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
In the light of the preceding discussion and without making any observations on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant-Meenu @ Meenua involved in Case Crime No.98 of 2021 at Police Station-Jahanabad, District-Fatehpur under Sections 272 I.P.C. and Section 60(2) of Excise Act be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not influence any witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
Order Date :- 17.12.2021 Dhananjai