Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Meenu @ Mainpal vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10686 of 2021 Applicant :- Meenu @ Mainpal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Kalim Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Avinash Pandey
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Matter taken up in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application.
Sri Avinash Pandey, learned counsel for the first informant is also not present even when the matter is taken in the revised list.
Sri Ankit Srivastava, learned counsel for the State is present.
The present anticipatory bail application is dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order dated 10.08.2021 is hereby vacated.
Learned counsel for the State shall communicate this order to the Investigating Officer/Station House Officer concerned within one week from today.
Order Date :- 28.10.2021 AS Rathore (Samit Gopal,J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Meenu @ Mainpal vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 October, 2021
Judges
  • Samit Gopal
Advocates
  • Mohd Kalim