Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Meenal Ilangovan vs The Commissioner Of ...

Madras High Court|25 July, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is reported by the learned counsel appearing on either side that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous.
2.In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed.
To
1.The Commissioner of Municipalities, Chepauk, Chennai.
2.The Regional Director of Municipalities (Admn), Near Kodimarathu Moolai, Tanjore.
3.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.
4.The Commissioner, Aranthangi Municipality, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District.
5.The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Aranthangai, Pudukkottai District. .
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Meenal Ilangovan vs The Commissioner Of ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
25 July, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.