Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Meenakshi vs The District Revenue Officer

Madras High Court|16 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.A.Kumar, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents and by consent of the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.
2. Heard both sides.
3. The case of the petitioner is that her property was acquired as early as in 1999 by the National Highways Department for the purpose of Outer Ring Road and however, compensation for such acquisition has not been paid to her so far.
4. Ventilating such grievance, the petitioner has made a request through her counsel on 05.09.2017, apart from sending a representation by her as early as on 14.09.2016. It is stated that the above request of the petitioner has not been considered so far. Needless to say, that it is for the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner immediately and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, without loss of further time, if the contentions of the petitioner are factually correct. Thus, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to pass orders on those representations of the petitioner on merits and in accordance with law after giving due opportunity of hearing as well, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
16.11.2017 Speaking/Non speaking Index: Yes/No vsi To
1. The District Revenue Officer, O/o District Collector, Tiruvalur.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ambattur Taluk, Tiruvallur District.
K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J.
vsi W.P.No.29250 of 2017 16.11.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Meenakshi vs The District Revenue Officer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
16 November, 2017