IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO.1477 OF 2016 (LA - BDA) BETWEEN:
SMT. MEENAKSHI S. AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, W/O SRI S. SURYANARAYANA, R/AT NO. 2022, SOBHA JASMINE, OUTER RING ROAD, BELLANDUR, BENGALURU - 560 103 …PETITIONER (BY SRI C M NAGABUSHANA, ADV. - ABSENT) AND:
1. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST EXTN., BENGALURU - 560 020.
REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
2. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST EXTN., BENGALURU - 560 020.
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU – 01.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.SHWETHA KRISHNAPPA, HCGP. FOR R3–ABSENT R1 AND R2 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ALLOT ALTERNATE SITE IN ARKAVATHI LAYOUT, TO THE PETITIONER AND EXECUTE AND REGISTER SALE DEED AS DEMANDED BY THE PETITIONER IN HIS REPRESENTATION AT ANNX-D1 ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The plea of the petitioner is for a writ of mandamus to direct respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 08.09.2014 vide Annexure ‘D1’.
2. In view of the long lapse of time, I deem it just and appropriate to direct the respondent No.1 to do so.
3. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed off.
Respondent No.1 is directed to consider the representation dated 08.09.2014 vide Annexure ‘D1’ and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
SD/-
JUDGE nvj