Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Meena Devi And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|05 January, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44311 of 2020 Applicant :- Smt. Meena Devi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Kamlesh Prasad,Buddhi Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned AGA-I for the State and perused the record.
The submission of learned counsel for the applicants is that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. They are innocent and have no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that applicant have not named in the first information report and have not committed any offence as alleged in the first information report. It is also submitted that applicants are the parents of accused Sani on account of which they have falsely roped in the present case. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicants have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicants that they are ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make themselves available before the court whenever required. The applicants are languishing in jail since 28.06.2020. He undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted, therefore, he may be released on bail.
Learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, (2018) 3 SCC 22, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let the applicants- Smt. Meena Devi and Ghanshyam Pasi involved in Sessions Trial No. 214 of 2019 arising out of Case Crime No. 194 of 2018, under Sections 363, 366, 368 IPC, Police Station Shankargarh, District Prayagraj be released on bail, on their executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:
1. The applicants will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. They will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. They will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicants to prison.
It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.
The party is permitted to file a computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of Allahabad High Court before the court concerned, who shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of Allahabad High Court and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 5.1.2021 Arti
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Meena Devi And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
05 January, 2021
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Kamlesh Prasad Buddhi Prakash