Court No. - 70
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32023 of 2019 Applicant :- Mayank @ Prince @ Mayank Dubey And 3 Ors Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Srivastava,Sunil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
At the outset, learned counsel for the applicants submitted that name of applicant No. 1 has wrongly been transcribed in the application as Manyak @ Prince @ Mank Dubey in place of Mayank @ Prince @ Mayank Dubey.
In view above, learned counsel for the applicants is permitted to correct the name of applicant No. 1 in the application during the course of the day.
Office and computer centre of this Court are directed to correct the name of applicant No. 1 as Mayank @ Prince @ Mayank Dubey in the computer database record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State/opposite party no.1 and perused the record with the assistance of learned counsel for the parties.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the order dated 30.4.2019 as well as entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.3050 of 2018, under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 452 IPC pending in the court of Additional Civil Judge-IV, (Junior Division) Mirzapur.
After advancing certain arguments at length by learned counsel for the applicants, when the Court put certain query to him, he gave up his challenge to the aforesaid impugned order dated 30.4.2019 against the applicants and confined his submission requesting to grant some protection to the applicants to surrender before the concerned court below. Learned counsel for the applicants further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application on merits and prayed that a direction may be issued to the concerned courts below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously in accordance with law.
In view of above, the relief as sought by the applicants in the instant application is refused.
Considering the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that in case applicants appear before the concerned court below within 45 days from today and apply for bail, the bail application of the applicants shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law keeping in view of the Seven Judges' decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2005 Criminal Law Journal 755 as well as judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.; (2009) 4 Supreme Court Cases, 437.
For the period of 45 days from today or till the date of appearance of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the above case.
With the above observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of.
Order Date :- 26.9.2019 Sumaira