IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.10154 OF 2016 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
MAX TRADER NO.12, 1ST MAIN ROAD CHAKRAVARTHY IYENGAR LAYOUT SESHADRIPURAM BENGALURU-560 020 REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SMT.PRIYA BIRADAR (BY SRI.HEGDE V.S., ADV.) AND:
… PETITIONER 1. KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, BENGALURU (AN ORIGINATION OF GOVT. OF KARNATAKA) NO.179, 3RD FLOOR, ROOPA COMPLEX, 1ST MAIN ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 020 REP. BY IT’S THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 2. K.SOHANARAJ AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS NO.736, MANDIPET DAVANAGERE-577 001 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.NAGAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R-1; SRI.VIGNESHWAR S.SHASTRY, ADV. FOR R-2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18.01.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri. Hegde V. S, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri. Nagaiah, learned counsel for respondent No.1.
Sri. Vighneshwar S. Shastry, learned counsel for respondent No.2.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is heard finally.
2. In this petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 18.01.2016 submitted by the petitioner as per Annexure-F.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 18.01.2016 submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent No.1 submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioner shall be dealt with in accordance with law, if not already decided.
5. In view of the submissions made and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the competent authority shall decide the representation submitted by the petitioner, if not already decided, in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
sd/- JUDGE Mds/-