IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.40106 OF 2019 (GM-MM-S) BETWEEN:
M/S. MATHRUSHRI STONE CRUSHER A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT, NO.6/2, VRUSHABAVATHI NAGAR, 7TH MAIN, KAMAKSHI PALYA, BENGALURU-560 079 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI K. DAYANAND, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS.
...PETITIONER (BY SRI PRAKASH B.S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, (MSME AND MINES), VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001.
2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR/REVISION AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, SOUTH ZONE, MYSURU-570 022.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI Y.H. VIJAY KUMAR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF THE REVISION PETITION (FORM RV) DATED 15.03.2019 PENDING BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.2 EXPEDITIOUSLY WITHIN A TIME FRAME, COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A FILED BY THE PETITIONER AGAINST THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 27.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, BENGALURU URBAN DEPARTMENT.
***** THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The plea of the petitioner is that the revision petition is pending before the second respondent. It is not yet disposed off. Hence, he seeks for writ of mandamus for early disposal.
2. Learned Government Advocate who appears for respondents submits that the revision petition will be disposed off in accordance with law. In view of the submission made, we do not find any delay is being caused by the second respondent to dispose off the revision. Necessarily the same will be done in accordance with law.
We find no good ground to grant a writ of mandamus. Hence, petition is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE Rsk/-