IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. N. SATYANARAYANA Writ Petition No.28877 of 2019 (LR) BETWEEN:
M/S MATHRUBOOMI ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED NO. 104, L-WING, BRIGADE GATEWAY APARTMENTS, 26/1, SUBRAMANYANAGAR, RAJAJINAGAR EXTENSION, BENGALURU - 560055.
BY ITS DIRECTOR SHRI. ASHOK KUMAR GANDHI, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. LATE MANGILAL JAIN (BY SRI. G R MOHAN, ADV.) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDINGS, BENGALURU - 56001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA - 562159 3. THE TAHASILDAR RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA - 562159 (BY SMT. B. P. RADHA, AGA) ... PETITIONER ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER HIS APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION U/S 109 (1)(V) OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT, 1961 BY SUBMITTING FORM 15A (RULE 38-D) OF LAND BEARING S.NO.27/2 1 ACRE 06 GUTNAS SITUATE KALLUGOPAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGAR TALUK AND DISTRICT AS PER ANENXURE-D DATED 23.12.2017.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R This writ petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the application of the petitioner for permission under Section 109(1)(v) of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 for acquisition of land bearing Sy.No.27/2 measuring to an extent of 1 acre 6 guntas situated at Kallugopahalli Village, Bidadi Hobli, Ramanagar Taluk and District. The relevant application dated 23.12.2017 is at Annexure-D.
2. When this matter is called this day, learned AGA would bring to the notice of this Court that respondent Nos.1 and 2 have considered the prayer of the petitioner by Official Memorandum dated 24.07.2019 vide No.RA.JI.KA/LRF/CR/81/2017-18 and would place a copy of the same before this Court.
3. With this, it is clearly seen that the prayer of the petitioner being considered, the present writ petition does not survive for consideration as it has become infructuous. Accordingly it is disposed of.
Sd/- Judge RD