Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Kerala
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Mathew Thomas

High Court Of Kerala|24 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioners herein are the accused in S.C No.183 of 2012 of the Sessions Court, Pathanamthitta. Crime in the said case was registered under Sections 341, 323 and 506 (ii) of Indian Penal code and also under Section 3 (1) (x) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the Act'), on the complaint of one Krishnankutty that the petitioners herein assaulted him and humiliated him on the ground that he belongs to scheduled caste. Now the petitioners seek orders under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the ground that they and the complainant have amicably settled the whole dispute, and the complainant has no grievance or complaint now. Being a prosecution involving an offence under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, I directed the de facto complainant – Krishnankutty to appear in court in person. Accordingly, he appeared, and I interacted with him as Crl.M.C No.6441 of 2014 2
regards the settlement reported. He submitted before the court that he has settled the matter voluntarily with the accused, and that he has no grievance or complaint.
2. In so many decisions, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the High Court can quash prosecution, if the parties have come to terms, and continuance of prosecution will not serve any purpose. This can be done even in cases involving non-compoundable offences. Here, I find that the dispute is purely personal in nature, though the crime happened to be registered under Section 3 (1) (x) of the Act also. I find a real and genuine settlement here, and I find that the prosecution can be quashed, because in the present circumstances nobody will support the prosecution, and continuance of prosecution will not serve any purpose, other than wasting the precious time of the trial court. It will also cause harm and hardship to both sides.
In the result, this petition is allowed. The prosecution against the petitioner in S.C No. 183 of 2012 of the Court of Session, Pathanamthitta will stand quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, the Crl.M.C No.6441 of 2014
3
petitioners will stand released from prosecution, and the bail bond, if any, executed by them will stand discharged.
ma /True copy/ Sd/- P.UBAID JUDGE P.S to Judge
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mathew Thomas

Court

High Court Of Kerala

JudgmentDate
24 November, 2014
Judges
  • P Ubaid
Advocates
  • Sri
  • V R Manoranjan