IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1767/2011 BETWEEN:
M/S MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE PLOT NO.1, NELSON MANDELA ROAD VASANTH KUNJ NEW DELHI – 110 070 REP. BY ITS TERRITORIAL SERVICE MANAGER SRI BIKRAM SATAPATHY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI S.SHAKER SHETTY, ADV.) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY DOBASPET POLICE STATION BENGALURU 1(a) M/S MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR HEAD OFFICE ADDRESS:
NO.1, NELSON MANDELA ROAD VASANT KUNJ, NEW DELHI – 110 070.
1(b) M/S MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) HEAD OFFICE ADDRESS:
NO.1, NELSON MANDELA ROAD VASANT KUNJ, NEW DELHI – 110 070 1(c) M/S RNS MOTORS LTD.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ADDRESS:
NO.2275, TUMKUR MAIN ROAD GORAGUNTEPALYA YESHWANTHPUR BENGALURU – 560 022 1(d) M/S RNS MOTORS LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER (CEO) ADDRESS:
NO.2275, TUMKUR MAIN ROAD GORAGUNTEPALYA, YESHWANTHPUR BENGALURU 560 022. …PROPOSED RESPONDENTS 2. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE NANJAPPA, 37 YEARS E.TV KANNADA VAHINI SENIOR COMMUNICATOR BENGALURU.
(BY SRI S.RACHAIAH, HCGP FOR R1;
…RESPONDENTS SRI B.S.ARAVINDA BABU, ADV. FOR PROPOSED R1(C) & (D); PROPOSED R1(A) & R1(B) – SERVED;
PARTY-IN-PERSON – R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS C.C.NO.444/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE C.J. (JR.DN.) AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the respondents 1(c) & (d) submits that the original case before the Trial Court C.C.C.No.444/2010 has already been disposed of on 12.2.2015.
2. In view of the above said submission, this petition does not survive for consideration and accordingly the same is dismissed. If the complainant is aggrieved by the order of the learned Magistrate dated 12.2.2015, he can challenge the same in accordance with law.
In view of the disposal of the case, I.As 1 and 2 of 2017 do not survive for consideration and accordingly the applications are also dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE DVR: