IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION Nos.1045 – 1046/2019 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN:
1. SMT.MARIYAMMA W/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 2. SRI BYREGOWDA S/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 3. SRI RAGHAVENDRA S/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 4. SMT.KAMALAMMA D/O LATE DHOBI NARAYANASWAMY W/O MUNINARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 5. SRI MUNIRAJU W/O LATE DHOBI NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS PETITIONER No.1 TO 5 ARE R/AT MALAMACHANAHALLI, JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI SIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 105.
6. SMT.SHOBHA W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 7. SRI NAVEEN KUMAR S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS 8. SRI BABU S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS PETITIONER No.6 TO 8 ARE R/AT AKKIMANGALA VILLAGE SANTHEKALLAHALLI POST, CHINTHAMANI TALUK - 563 125 CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 9. SMT.RATHNAMMA W/O LATE DHOBI NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT MALAMACHANAHALLI JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI SIDLAGHATTA TALUK - 562 105 CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT. ... PETITIONERS [BY SRI J.R.JAGADISH, ADV.] AND:
1. SMT.AKKALAMMA W/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 2. SMT.RATHNAMMA W/O LATE RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 3. SRI LOKESH S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 4. SRI NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 5. SRI RAMANJINAPPA S/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 6. SMT.ASHWATHAMMA D/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 7. SMT.LAKSHMAMMA D/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 8. SMT.RATHNAMMA D/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS 9. SRI RAMANJINAPPA S/O LATE THIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT BASAVANAPURA VILLAGE JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI SIDLAGHATTA TALUK - 562 105 CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 18.12.2018 PASSED IN O.S.4/2010 BY THE HON'BLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, AT SIDLAGHATTA WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE - A AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE INTERLOCUTARY APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS UNDER ORDER 26 RULE 10-A READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE - D AND ORDER 16 RULE 6 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND ADDITIONAL AFFIDAVIT, WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE – E.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R After hearing the matter for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petitions and a memo is filed to the said effect.
Memo is placed on record. Permission is granted.
Accordingly, the writ petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE PMR