The matter under challenge is an order passed by the learned Sessions Judge just by approving what had happened in the mediation. The mediation settlement agreement has been entered into. According to the petitioner, she was seriously mislead and she had never concurred with any such mediation. It is the case of the petitioner that she had participated in the mediation, only because she believed that, that was good for her and presently it seems that the terms in the mediation settlement agreement are detrimental to her interest. In this context, the petitioner ought to have challenged the mediation settlement agreement as such and not merely the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge based on the mediation settlement agreement. The petitioner ought to have preferred an O.P. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw from this Crl.R.P with permission to file an O.P. In the result, this Crl.R.P is dismissed as withdrawn without 2 prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file an O.P. on the same subject matter.
(B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) stu