Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Mariaben vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|29 June, 2012
Rule.
Mr.Kodekar, learned APP appears and waives service of rule for respondent - State.
The instant application is filed u/s.438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Anjar police station C.R.No.-I-178 of 2012 regarding the offences punishable u/ss.307, 326, 325, 323, 504, 506(2), 143, 147, 148 and 149 of the IPC.
Mr.Qureshi, learned advocate for the applicants - lady accused persons, at the outset, took me through the relevant part of the FIR and submitted that the role attributed to the applicants - lady accused persons is that the injured was caught hold of by them. It is further submitted that all the male accused persons named in the FIR have been released on regular bail by the trial Court. It is further submitted that now injured is in hospital.
Mr.Kodekar, learned APP for the respondent - State opposed this application.
Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both the sides, so also considering the role attributed to the applicants - lady accused persons in the instant matter, this Court is of the opinion that the application deserves to be granted.
This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Reported in [2011]1 SCC 694, wherein the Apex Court reiterated the law laid down by the Constitutional Bench in the case of Shri Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors. Reported in [1980]2 SCC 565.
Learned counsel for the parties do not press for further reasoned order.
In the result, this application is allowed by directing that in the event of the applicants herein being arrested pursuant to FIR being Anjar police station C.R.No.-I-178 of 2012, the applicants shall be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with one surety of like amount on following conditions :-
[a] shall cooperate with the investigation and make themselves available for interrogation whenever required.
[b] shall remain present at concerned Police Station on 6.7.2012 between 11:00 am to 2:00 pm. [c] shall not hamper the investigation in any manner nor shall directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;
[d] shall at the time of execution of bond, furnish the address to the Investigating Officer and the Court concerned and shall not change the residence till the final disposal of the case or till further orders;
[e] will not leave India without the permission of the Court and, if is holding a Passport, shall surrender the same before the trial Court immediately [f] it would be open to the Investigating Officer to file an application for remand, if he considers it just and proper and the concerned Magistrate would decide it on merits.
[g] despite this order, it would be open for the Investigating Agency to apply to the competent Magistrate, for police remand of the applicants. The applicants shall remain present before the learned Magistrate on the first date of hearing of such application and on all subsequent occasions, as may be directed by the learned Magistrate. This would be sufficient to treat the accused in the judicial custody for the purpose of entertaining application of the prosecution for police remand. This is, however, without prejudice to the right of the accused to seek stay against an order of remand, if ultimately granted, and the power of the learned Magistrate to consider such a request in accordance with law. It is clarified that the applicant, even if, remanded to the police custody, upon completion of such period of police remand, shall be set free immediately, subject to other conditions of this anticipatory bail order.
For modification and/or deletion of any of the conditions herein above, the applicant/s will be at liberty to approach the concerned Court and such Court shall decide the application for modification and/or deletion of any of the conditions of this order in accordance with law.
At the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicants on bail.
Rule made absolute. Application is disposed of accordingly.
Direct service is permitted.
(J.C.UPADHYAYA, J.)(binoy) Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mariaben vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgementDate
29 June, 2012