Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9988 of 2021 Petitioner :- Maqsood Ahamad Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Alok Mishra
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 and Sri Alok Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent no.2.
The petitioner was Class IV employee and has retired on 30.05.2020. The benefit of 7th Pay Commission has not been given to him and in this respect, petitioner has submitted several representations to respondent no.2-Nagar Ayukta, Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar, copy of one of which is annexed as Annexure-5 to the writ petition.
The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent no.2 has neither considered his representation nor has paid any heed to his representation.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2- Nagar Ayukta, Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar, raising all his grievances within a period of two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same by reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months thereafter.
The writ petition is disposed of subject to the observations made above.
Order Date :- 12.8.2021 SS