Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Maqboolan @ Maqoolan vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38797 of 2019 Petitioner :- Maqboolan @ Maqoolan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Syed Mohammad Nawaz, Shahabuddin Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Pranjal Mehrotra
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, for the following relief:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction to quash the impugned demand/recovery notice of rupees 12,81,317 contained in annexure 2 dated 04.04.2019 as well as to pass interim mandamus staying the effect and operation of impugned demand/recovery notice dated 04.04.2019 of annexure 2 during the pendency of the writ petition and to issue an ad interim mandamus directing the respondents to connect the electricity line connection bearing account no. 4308529422 in the premise."
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the electricity department and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the respondents are taking coercive action against the petitioner without giving any opportunity of hearing and without following the provisions contained under the U.P. Electricity Supply Code 2005.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking a lenient view in the matter, we direct the petitioner to appear on 12.12.2019 at 11.00 A.M. before the Respondent No.3, Executive Engineer along with his objection and adduce his evidence, if any, in support of his contention.The Respondent No.3, thereafter, shall pass a final order by a speaking and reasoned order after considering the objections of the petitioner as well as the contention raised by the petitioner within a period of four weeks thereafter.
For a period of seven weeks from today or till the disposal of the representation/objection, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. In case of default in filing the objection/representation, as indicated herein above, the present interim order shall stand vacated automatically.
In case the petitioner is aggrieved with the final order, if any, passed against the petitioner, it will be open for the petitioner to file an appeal before the concerned authority under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003 in accordance with law.
It is made clear that in case the petitioner does not appear on the said date fixed, the impugned recovery citation shall stand revived automatically.
With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 28.11.2019 Arun
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Maqboolan @ Maqoolan vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2019
Judges
  • Shashi Kant Gupta
Advocates
  • Syed Mohammad Nawaz Shahabuddin