Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Manoj Kumar vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 16339 of 2021 Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Kant Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
Applicant- Manoj Kumar seeks anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 630 of 2021, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District- Etah.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant is wholly innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. He has next submitted that the applicant has no role to play in the said incident.
Per contra, learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and has submitted that the applicant has made forged signature on the release order and in the preliminary inquiry, he has been found to be guilty of the offence, as such, no case for anticipatory bail is made out.
In view of the aforesaid facts and looking to the gravity and seriousness of the accusations and complicity of the applicant, I do not find it is a fit case for anticipatory bail.
This anticipatory bail application is, accordingly, rejected. Order Date :- 30.9.2021 KU
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Manoj Kumar vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 September, 2021
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Krishna Kant Shukla