Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Manoj Chaudhari vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52646 of 2019 Applicant :- Manoj Chaudhari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shyam Lal,Shiv Chand Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 121 of 2019, under Sections 354D, 376D IPC, Section 5/6 of POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act, Police Station- Sonha, District- Basti, and is in jail since 24.07.2019, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that similarly placed co-accused, Satish Sharma, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court by order dated 28.11.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 52463 of 2019. He further submitted that since the role of the applicant is identical to that of co-accused, Satish Sharma, who has already been enlarged on bail, he is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.
The prayer for bail has vehemently been opposed by learned A.G.A.
Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A., this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for grant of bail on the ground of parity.
In view of the above, let the applicant, Manoj Chaudhari be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned in Case Crime No. 121 of 2019, under Sections 354D, 376D IPC, Section 5/6 of POCSO Act and Section 3(2) (V) of SC/ST Act, Police Station- Sonha, District- Basti with the following conditions :-
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 28.11.2019 Rohit
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Manoj Chaudhari vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2019
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Shyam Lal Shiv Chand Yadav