Ashok Bhushan, Ag.CJ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. No notice need be issued to respondents in view of the order which is being passed. 2. By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a mandamus directing the first respondent not to interfere in a civil dispute. The petitioner’s case is that original suit is pending before the civil court being O.S. No.493/12. He submits that at the instance of respondents, petitioners are being harassed by the police authority.
3. Learned State Attorney after obtaining instructions submitted that petitioner has two shop rooms in a commercial complex and he started construction of urinal in a common area and with regard to which adjoining shop WP(C).No.30213/2014 2 owners have filed complaint, with reference to which petitioners and others were called and the police after finding that it is a civil dispute, closed the matter and no further measures are taken in that regard. In view of the above submission we do not see any reason to continue the writ petition.
The writ petition is closed.
ASHOK BHUSHAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE.
sou.