Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Manohar Ram Nai vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 September, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29576 of 2021 Applicant :- Manohar Ram Nai Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rudra Kant Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.0294 of 2021, under Sections 370, 370 (Ka) IPC, Section 11 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, Police Station Robertsganj, District Sonebhadra.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that three persons were named in the first information report including the applicant. It has been alleged in the F.I.R., that co-accused Kripal Singh was marrying off her daughter aged about 14 to the applicant. He further submits that co-accused Ram Kripal, father of the victim has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 09.08.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 27249 of 2021. The remaining two co-accused namely, Vijay Kumar Paswan, Mahaveer Prasad have also been granted bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated 06.08.2021, 11.08.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 27844, 29508 of 2021, therefore, the applicant is entitled for bail on the ground of parity. There is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. It is next contended that there is no criminal history of the applicant and he is languishing in jail since 10.06.2020.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid fact that co- accused have already been released on bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and also perusing the material on record, enlargement of co-accused on bail, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant Manohar Ram Nai, involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his/her furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he will not tamper with the evidence and will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and will cooperate with the trial. The applicant shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 27.9.2021 S.Ali
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Manohar Ram Nai vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 September, 2021
Judges
  • Ali Zamin
Advocates
  • Rudra Kant Mishra