Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Manne Padmavathi vs A P Transco

High Court Of Telangana|23 September, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN :PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WP .NO: 19141 of 2014 Between:
Manne Padmavathi, W/o.Veeraswamy, R/o.Achanta Village & Mandal, West Godavari District.
AND . Petitioner
1 A.P. TRANSCO, Rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director, Vidyutsoudha, Somajiguda, Hyderabad.
2 A.P. Eastern Power Distribution Corporation Ltd., Rep by its Managing Director, Visakhapatnam.
3 The Superintending Engineer, APEPDCL, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.
4 The Assistant Engineer, TLC, SS, Sub-Division, A.P. Transco, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.
. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in trying to erect H.T. Electricity Tower in the Petitioner's lands an extent of Ac.3.00 cents covered by Sy.Nos.385/2 and 385/3B of China Brahmadevam Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, without following due process of law, as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, violative of principles of natural justice, colourable exercise of power.
WPMP.NO: 23995 of 2014 Petition under Section 151 of C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in the W.P., the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to erect H.T. Electricity Tower in the Petitioner's lands an extent of Ac.3.00 cents covered by Sy.Nos.385/2 and 385/3B of China Brahmadevam Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, pending disposal of WP No.19141 of 2014 on the file of the High Court.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed herein and order of the High Court dated 11-07-2014 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Bolla Venkata Rama Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner, Sri O. Manoher Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 4 and Sri P. Anand Seshu, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 3, the Court made the following ORDER:
Learned standing counsel for respondents seeks time for filing counter.
Post after one week in motion list.
Interim order granted earlier shall stand extended for a period of one week.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To
1 One CC to Sri Bolla Venkata Rama Rao, Advocate (OPUC)
2 One spare copy.
Tvr HIGH COURT ARR,J DATED: 18-7-2014 NOTE: Post after one week in motion list ORDER W.P.NO. 19141 OF 2014 STATUS-QUO EXTENDED DRAFTED: TVR DATED: 19-07-2014 HIGH COURT ARR,J DATED: 18-7-2014 NOTE: Post after one week in motion list ORDER W.P.NO. 19141 OF 2014 STATUS-QUO EXTENDED
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Manne Padmavathi vs A P Transco

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
23 September, 2014
Judges
  • A Rajasheker Reddy