Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mannan vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27077 of 2019 Petitioner :- Mannan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brij Bihari Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and perused the record.
2. Petitioner is seeking a mandamus commanding private respondents-5 to 11 not to interfere in his possession over land in dispute.
3. This writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution is nothing but a suit for injunction against private persons for which remedy lies in common law by filing a suit for injunction. The writ petition for the said purpose is not maintainable.
4. Dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mannan vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Brij Bihari Yadav