IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK B. HINCHIGERI WRIT PETITION No.33037 OF 2015 (GM-RES) BETWEEN :
Manjunatha S. S/o.Seebaiah, Aged about 26 years, C/o.No.212, 1st Cross, Madhavanagar, Bangalore – 01. ... Petitioner (By Sri D.R.Ravishankar, Advocate) AND:
1. Bar Council of India, No. Rouse Avenue, Institutional Area, New Delhi – 110 002, Represented by its Secretary.
2. Legal Education Committee, Bar Council of India, No. Rouse Avenue, Institutional Area, New Delhi – 110 002, Represented by its Chairman.
3. Karnataka State Bar Council, Old K.G.I.D. Building, Dr.Ambedkar Veedi, Bangalore – 560 001, Represented by its Secretary. …Respondents (By Sri Vikram, Advocate for Sri S.Sriranga for M/s.Just Law, Advocates for R1 and R2:
R3 served and unrepresented) This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the R1 to consider and to take decision in furtherance of the resolutions of the R2 dated 16/17.4.2011 vide Annexure-B, etc.
This writ petition, coming on for orders, this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R Sri D.R.Ravishankar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be content if a direction is given to the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation, dated 02.06.2015 (Annexure-C).
2. Sri Vikram, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent is not averse to consider the petitioner’s said representation but strictly in accordance with law.
3. Recording the submissions of the learned advocates, I dispose of this petition with a direction to the respondent No.1 to consider the petitioner’s said representation, dated 02.06.2015 (Annexure-C) in accordance with law and as expeditiously as possible and in any case within an outer limit of one month from the date of the issuance of the certified copy of today’s order. No order as to costs.
Sd/- JUDGE Cm/-