IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO. 6421 OF 2018 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
1. MANJUNATHA S. G.
S/O SHIVARUDRAPPA G. 48 YEARS ELECTRICAL CLASS I CONTRACTOR, R/O BHANUVALLI HARIHAR TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT 2. HEMANTAREDDI S/O BASAVAREDDI GOVINDAREDDER AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS ELECTRICAL CLASS I CONTRACTOR R/O MALANAYAKANAHALLI RANEBENNUR TALUK, HAVERI DISTRICT 3. K A SAMIULLA S/O ATHAULLA KANAVALLI AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS ELECTRICAL CLASS I CONTRACTOR, NO.159, I MAIN ROAD 12TH MAIN ROAD H S BADAVANE, HARIHAR DAVANAGERE DISTRICT 4. SRI ATHAULLA S/O ATHAULLA KANAVALLI AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS ELECTRICAL CLASS I CONTRACTOR, H S BADAVANE, HARIHAR DAVANAGERE DISTRICT (BY SRI. S G KADADAKATTI, ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONERS AND :
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICITY AND POWER, VIDHANASOUDHA DR AMBDEKARVEEDHI BENGALURU 560 001.
2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LTD POWER OF HOUSE, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU.
3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BENGALURU POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY LTD. CAVERY BHAVAN, BENGALURU 4. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD., CAUVERY BHAVAN , BENGALURU.
5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD CAVERY BHAVAN, BENGALURU 6. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD DAVANGERE DIVISION, DAVANGERE.
7. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGNEER (ELEC) BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LTD CIRCLE OFFICE, DAVANGERE.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAY KUMAR A. PATIL, AGA FOR R.1.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE TENDER NOTIFICATION DATED 18.12.2017 ISSUED BY R-7 VIDE ANNEX-K BY ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION..
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER None appeared for the petitioners.
Sri Vijay Kumar A. Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1 submits that in this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the validity of the tender notification dated 18.12.2017 and now the proceedings pursuant to the aforesaid tender notification may have been finalized. Therefore, nothing survive for adjudication in this writ petition.
The aforesaid submission is taken on record.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE SA Ct:sr