IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 09TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.50143 OF 2019 (BDA-PIL) BETWEEN:
1. MANJEGOWDA K.G., SON OF GIRIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, #587/F, KARIYANAPALYA, NEAR MARAMMA TEMPLE, SUBRAMANYANAGAR, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 061.
2. KARIGOWDA SON OF NINGEGOWDA, #35, KARIYANAPALYA, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BANASHANKARI 6TH STAGE, SUBRAMANAYANAGAR, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU – 560 061.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI NANDISH PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:
THE COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARAPARK WEST, BENGALURU – 560 020.
... RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 05.09.2019 VIDE ANNEXURE - D ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER This writ petition is filed seeking for a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 05.09.2019 at Annexure-A.
2. On considering the plea of the petitioners, we are of the view that the writ petition is premature. Reasonable time has to be granted to the respondents to consider the representations and to respond to the same. Filing a petition within a period of 40 days from the date of filing of the representation is undoubtedly premature.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE Cs/-
CT:MJ