Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Order on Criminal Misc. Exemption Application This exemption application is allowed.
Order on Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants,Manjeet Choudhary, Vikki, Arya and Smt. Shazia @ Shazi, with a prayer to release them on bail inCase Crime No. 769 of 2020, under Sections- 366, 379 IPC, Police Station- Baheri, District- Bareilly,during pendency of trial.
Prior notice of this bail application was served in the office of Government Advocate and as per Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 of the Allahabad High Court Rules and as per direction dated 20.11.2020 of this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 8072 of 2020, Govind Mishra @ Chhotu Versus State of U.P., hence, this anticipatory bail application is being heard. Grant of further time to the learned A.G.A as per Section 438 (3) Cr.P.C. (U.P. Amendment) is not required.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that there is allegationagainstapplicant no. 1 that he abducted the daughter of the informantwho is arrayed as applicant no. 4 in the bail application. Application nos. 2 and 3 are thefriends of applicant no. 1 and therefore theyhave been implicated. Counsel for the applicantsfurther submits that the applicant no. 4 hasmarried the applicant no. 1 in AryaSamaj Mandir. She is living with the applicant no. 1 as his wife. However, no statement of the victim has been recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. The applicants will produce the victim, applicant no. 4, before Chief Judicial Magistrate,Bareilly, if directed.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the applicants. He has submitted that in view of seriousness of the allegations made against the applicants, they are not entitled to grant of anticipatory bail. The apprehension of the applicants is not founded on any material on record. Only on the basis of imaginary fear, anticipatory bail cannot be granted.
In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that applicants will produce the victim, applicant no. 4, Smt. Shazia @ Shazi, before the C.J.M., concerned, within a period of three weeks. The C.J.M. concerned will record her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. The applicants shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail for the period of three weeks initially and on compliance of this order, it shall be extended. On failure to comply this order, anticipatory bail granted to the applicants shall stand cancelled and the police shall be free to arrest the applicants.
In the event of arrest and on compliance of the above order, the applicants shall be released on anticipatory bail forthree weeksand on compliance of this order till cognizance is taken by the Court on the police report, if any, under section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/ concerned Court with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police officer as and when required;
(ii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport, the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.
(iv) The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
(v) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer/Govt. Advocate is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants.
The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation, if pending, of the present case in accordance with law, expeditiously, independently without being prejudiced by any observations made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicants.
The applicants are directed to produce a copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, if investigation is in progress, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.
In case the applicant no. 4,Smt. Shazia @ Shazi, expresses her willingness to live with the applicants in her statement recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C., then the applicants, in case of their arrest, shall be released on anticipatory bail. Let the applicants involved in the aforesaid crime be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned with the following conditions:-
1. The applicants shall not leave the country during the currency of trial without prior permission from the concerned trial Court.
2. The applicants shall surrender their passports, if any, to the concerned Court forthwith. Their passports will remain in custody of the concerned Court.
3. That the applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
4. The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law to ensure presence of the applicants.
5. In case, the applicants misuse the liberty of bail, the Court concerned may take appropriate action in accordance with law and judgment of Apex Court in the case of Sushila Aggarwal vs. State (NCT of Delhi)- 2020 SCC Online SC 98.
6. The applicants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court, default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of their bail and proceed against them in accordance with law.
7. The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 12.2.2021 Rohit