Leave to amend.
Heard learned advocate Mr.Maulik G. Nanavati for the appellants, learned advocate Mr.Nilesh M. Shah for the respondent No.1 and learned advocate Mr.Dipen C. Shah for the respondents No.2 to 5.
In view of the contention raised with regard to the fraud and submission regarding transaction and the original sale deed executed on 28.10.1999, the matter requires detailed hearing. At the same time, the contention with regard to the preliminary objections based on the limitation as well as jurisdiction also can be considered.
ADMIT.
Civil Application No.3812 of 2012 to be heard along with main First Appeal.
[ RAJESH H. SHUKLA, J. ] vijay Top