Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Mangru Ias Sanjeev Ku. Maurya vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|14 June, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. The present criminal revision has been filed for quashing the order dated 22.02.2009 passed by learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Allahabad, in Case No. 11 of 1997, under Sections 308, 325, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Mauiama, District Allahabad.
The contention of the counsel for the revisionist is that no offence against the revisionist is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicant. All the submission made at the bar relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under revisional jurisdiction. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen. Moreover, the revisionist has got a right of discharge under Section 239 or 227/228, Cr.P.C. as the case may be through a proper application for the said purpose and he is free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court.
The prayer for quashing the summoning order is refused. However, it is directed that the revisionist shall appears and surrenders before the court below within 30 days from today and applies for bail, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. For a period of 30 days from today or till the disposal of the application for grant of bail whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the revisionist. However, in case, the revisionist does not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him. With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed off. Order Date :- 14.6.2010 vks
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mangru Ias Sanjeev Ku. Maurya vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
14 June, 2010