Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Mangaroo vs State Of U P & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 49499 of 2002 Petitioner :- Mangaroo Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimal Chandra Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
“i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to release the salary of the petitioner as Assistant Clerk month to month onwards since 2.2.2002.
ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to decide the representation dated 27.8.2002 and 7.9.2002 which is pending before the respondents.”
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mangaroo vs State Of U P & Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Vimal Chandra Mishra