IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.50782 OF 2016 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SMT. MANGALA D/O MAYANNA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO 226, 1ST MAIN ROAD, GANGADHARESHWARA SCHOOL ROAD, KAMALANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 079.
(BY SRI. CHRISTOPHER NOEL A., ADV.) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING VIKAS SOUDHA BENGALURU – 560 001 … PETITIONER 2. THE HOUSING BOARD COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD BENGALURU – 560 009 3. SMT. JAYALAKSHMI B.S W/O SAMPATHKUMAR M.K. AGED MAJOR, YELANKHA, BENGALURU.
(BY SRI. Y. D. HARSHA, AGA FOR R-1;
… RESPONDENTS SRI. R.SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADV. FOR R-2 SRI. H.M.MANJUNATH, ADV. FOR R2 SRI. VENKATA SATHYANARAYANA, ADV. FOR R-3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER PETITIONER’S REPRESENTATION DTD:9.9.2016 AT ANNEXURE-F1.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri. Christopher Noel A., learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri. Y. D. Harsha, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1.
Sri. R. Srinivasa Gowda, learned counsel for respondent No.2.
Sri. H. M. Manjunath, learned counsel for respondent No.2.
Sri. Venkata Sathyanarayana, learned counsel for respondent No.3.
In this petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 09.09.2016 submitted by the petitioner contained in Annexure-F1.
2. On perusal of the record, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law, if not already decided, by a speaking order within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. Ordered accordingly.
3. Till the representation filed by the petitioner is decided by the competent authority, ad-interim order dated 23.09.2016 granted by a bench of this Court, shall continue.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Mds/-