IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR W. P. No.61188/2016 (L-TER) BETWEEN THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S FESTO CONTROLS PVT. LTD, 237 B, BOMMASANDRA INDL. AREA BANGALORE-560058 REP BY MANAGING DIRECTOR HOSUR HIGHWAY BANGALORE-560099 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI.M.R.C-ADV) AND SRI. LOUIS MANOHARAN NO. 66, 2ND CROSS PAMMAGOWDA ROAD GEETHA MANDIR STREET J.C. NAGAR, BANGALORE-560056 SINCE DEAD, REP BY LRs 1. SMT. IYLENE W/O (LATE) LOUIS MANOHARAN AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 2. KUM BONICE JOANA D/O (LATE) LOUIS MANOHARAN AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS REP BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN APPLICANT NO.1 SMT. IYLENE BOTH ARE R/AT NO. 66, 2ND CROSS PAMMAGOWDA ROAD GEETHA MANDIR STREET J.C.NAGAR, BANGALORE-560006 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAROJINI MUTHANNA.K-ADV FOR C/R-1 & 2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE AWARD DATED:31.8.2016 PASSED BY THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE, IN COMPLAINT NO.1/2006 HOLDING THAT TERMINATION NOTICE DATED:19.7.2016 AS BAD IN LAW AND THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ARE ENTITLED FOR ALL THE BENEFITS ARISING OUT OF SETTING ASIDE THE TERMINATION NOTICE DATED:19.7.2006, INCLUDING THE TERMINAL BENEFITS AND ALSO ORDERING THE COST OF RS.1 LAKH, VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS WP COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. The petitioner is before this court on the premise that the Labour Court did not afford him sufficient opportunity to lead evidence.
3. It is seen that the complaint has been filed in 2006 and came to be disposed in 2016 by order dated 31.08.2016. The contention is baseless and petition does not deserve further consideration at the hands of this court.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE SS-CT Chs