Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Mamta And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7029 of 2021 Petitioner :- Smt. Mamta And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Kumar Kashyap,V.P. Singh Kashyap Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Girish Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent.
By means of the present petition, the petitioners are seeking for quashing of the first information report dated 11.7.2021 registered as Case Crime No.548 of 2021, under Section-363 I.P.C., P.S.-Jahangirabad District-Bulandshahr.
Sri Girish Kumar Yadav learned Advocate on behalf of the respondent no.4 (father) vehemently submits that the averments in the First Information Report regarding the petitioner no.1 (girl) being illiterate is incorrect in as much as she has passed Class-VIII in the year 2018-19. Further submission is that even entries in the adhar card has been manipulated for the purpose of the present petition.
However, in absence of proof of age, it is directed that the petitioner no.2 (boy) shall produce the petitioner no.1 (girl) before the court of Magistrate concerned on or before 6th September, 2021. Upon her production, the Magistrate concerned shall proceed to record the statement of petitioner no.1 to ascertain whether any force has been used on her or she has been voluntarily in the company of the petitioner no.2. In case, the petitioner no.1 deposes before the Magistrate concerned that force has been used on her, the Magistrate concerned shall proceed to pass appropriate orders immediately in respect of the custody/protection of the girl.
However, in case, the girl deposes that she has been voluntarily in the company of the petitioner no.2 or any other person and that no force has been used on her, learned Magistrate shall call upon the Investigating Officer of the case and fix a date for appearance of the informant or the parents or natural guardian of the girl for the purpose of determining the age of the girl.
On the date so fixed or within such reasonable time as may be required, the learned Magistrate shall proceed to determine the age of the girl as per law, keeping in mind the provisions that are applicable for determination of the age of a girl and may, if necessary, direct for ossification test/medical examination of the girl from a District Government Hospital.
If the girl is found to be a minor, the learned Magistrate shall proceed to pass appropriate orders in respect of custody of the girl, as per law. However, in case, the girl is found to be an adult, he shall proceed to record the statement of the girl under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
On the basis of the statement of the girl and the age of the girl as determined above, the police shall submit report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.
The aforesaid exercise shall be completed preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of the girl before the Magistrate concerned.
Till 6th September, 2021 or the date on which the girl is produced before the Magistrate concerned, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners in the above case. Thereafter, if the girl is produced before the Magistrate concerned as directed above, the accused shall be dealt with as per the statement of the girl. Though, in the event the girl is found to be minor, the police would be free to take the investigation to its logical conclusion and may effect arrest of the accused.
It is further clarified that if the girl is not produced by the date fixed as above, there shall be no protection and the investigating agency shall be free to take all steps that may be necessary to bring the investigation to its logical conclusion.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 24.8.2021 Harshita Digitally signed by SUNITA AGARWAL Date: 2021.08.24 14:54:50 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by Sadhna Rani Thakur Date: 2021.08.24 14:59:38 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Mamta And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 August, 2021
Judges
  • S Sunita Agarwal
Advocates
  • Manish Kumar Kashyap V P Singh Kashyap