Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Malti And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10961 of 2018 Applicant :- Malti And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mujib Ahmad Siddiqui Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Mujib Ahmad Siddiqui, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicants in support of his prayer for bail submit that the applicants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the applicants have no concern with the alleged incident. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicants a false recovery of Rs. 350/- and Rs. 500/- has been shown from the possession of the applicant no. 1 and 2 respectively, which is planted. It is further submitted that there is no any public witness of the alleged recovery or incident. It is further submitted that the applicants are the ladies. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicants have also been placed forth before the court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicants that they are ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicants are languishing in jail since 13.02.2018. The applicants have no other reported criminal antecedent.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment, the applicants are entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicants Malti and Shabana involved in Case Crime No. 38 of 2018, under Section 379, 411 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Aligarh be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond with two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
1. The applicants will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. They will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. They will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 27.3.2018 Arti
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Malti And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 March, 2018
Judges
  • Vivek Kumar Singh
Advocates
  • Mujib Ahmad Siddiqui