Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Mrs Malliga vs The Tamilnadu State Rep By Chief Secretariat And Others

Madras High Court|22 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22.06.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.15659 of 2017 Mrs.Malliga .. Petitioner Vs
1. The Tamilnadu State rep by Chief Secretariat, Secretariat, Chennai -600 009
2. The Secretary to Government, Home and Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009
3. The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai District
4. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District
5. The Inspector of Police, Kilpennathur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District
6. K.P. Ealumalai
7. Aaiyakannu ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 to 5 to consider and thereby disposing the petitioner representation dated 07.04.2017, 10.04.2017 and 24.04.2017 for to alter the offence under Sec.307 IPC and other relevant enactment against the accused in Cr.No.154 of 2017 on the file of 5th respondent police to include the main accused named as Aayakannu and K.P. Ealumalai in the FIR No.154 of 2017 on the file of the 5th respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.K. Yuvaraj For R.1 to R.5 : Mr.D.Vairamurthy Special Government Pleader O R D E R The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 to 5 to consider the representation of the petitioner.
2. Mr.D. Vairamurthy, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 1 to 5.
3. Considering the fact that the prayer of the petitioner is so limited to the extent that the representation of the petitioner dated 07.04.2017, followed by reminders dated 20.4.2017 and 24.04.2017 be disposed of at an early date. Without going into the merits of the case, I direct the fifth respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 07.04.2017, followed by reminders dated 20.4.2017 and 24.04.2017 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
22.06.2017 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No sr To
1. The Chief Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai -600 009
2. The Secretary to Government, Home and Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009
3. The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai District
4. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District
5. The Inspector of Police, Kilpennathur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District
6. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras R.MAHADEVAN, J.
sr WP.No.15659 of 2017 22.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mrs Malliga vs The Tamilnadu State Rep By Chief Secretariat And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
22 June, 2017
Judges
  • R Mahadevan