Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Mallan vs The Tashildhar

Madras High Court|27 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. Heard both sides.
K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J.
mk
3. The petitioner seeks for a mandamus directing the respondent to consider his representation dated 06.02.2017, wherein and whereby he sought for issuance of Patta in his favour.
4. The grievance of the petitioner before this Court is that the said representation has not been considered so far. This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the claim made by the petitioner, as it is for the respondent to consider and decide. Thus, this writ petition is disposed of, only with a direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 06.02.2017 and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the rival claimants, if any. Such exercise shall be done by the respondent within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
27.11.2017 Speaking/Non Speaking Index : Yes/No mk To The Tashildhar Karimangalam Taluk Dharmapuri District.
W.P.No.30586 of 2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mallan vs The Tashildhar

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
27 November, 2017