IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.915 OF 2014 BETWEEN:
1. CHIKKAIAH, S/O LATE KARAGI MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 2. SMT. CHIKKARASAMMA, W/O CHIKKAIAH, AGE: MAJOR 3. CHIKKAMADA S/O CHIKKAIAH, AGE: MAJOR ALL ARE R/O RAMANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK & DISTRICT-571 415 (BY SRI.NAGESH KUMAR.T.K, ADVOCATE) ...APPELLANTS AND:
SMT. MALLAMMA, W/O PUTTANANJA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O RAMANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK & DISTRICT-571415.
…RESPONDENT THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.01.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.621/2011 (OLD NO.124/2011) ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER OF F.T.C. IV AT MYSORE, CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.07.2011 PASSED IN O.S.NO.44/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE II CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT MYSORE AND ETC., THIS RSA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT On perusal of order dated 27.07.2018, it is evident that this Court had passed a peremptory order granting two weeks’ time to comply with office objections.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that all office objections are complied except one. But however, since it is peremptory order, the appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE CA