IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2017 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.14484 OF 2017 (GM-RES) PIL BETWEEN:
MALLAIAH S/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGE: 50 YEARS R/A MAYAGANAHALLI KASBA HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK – 571 511 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.K.R.ANANTHA MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION RAMANAGARA TALUK – 571 511 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA – 571 511 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA – 571 511 4. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA – 571 511 5. PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MAYAGANAHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH KASBA HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK – 571 511 6. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU – 560 001 7. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT RAMANAGARA – 571 511 8. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU – 560 001 9. CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU – 560 001 10.SHIVAGANGA PRIMARY SCHOOL MAYAGANAHALLI KASBA HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK – 571 511 BY ITS PRINCIPAL 11.SHIVAGANGA PUBLIC SCHOOL MAYAGANAHALLI KASBA HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK – 571 511 BY ITS PRINCIPAL 12.SHIVAGANGA EDUCATION TRUST MAYAGANAHALLI KASBA HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK – 571 511 REP. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE ... RESPONDENTS (SRI.VIVEK HOLLA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR R1 TO R9) This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct R1 and R2 to implement the conditions set out the permission letter dated 12.2.2016, 3.3.2012, 19.9.2015 issued in favour of 10th and 11th respondents as per Annexures-A, B, C, respectively, and etc., This petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, THE CHIEF JUSTICE made the following:
ORDER Mr.Vivek Holla, learned government pleader, appears for the respondent Nos.1 to 9.
2. The petitioner is a public and in no way concerned with the respondent Nos.10 and 11 - school.
3. This purported public interest litigation is moved alleging that the school authorities are not adhering to the various rules and regulations required to be adhered by them.
4. It is for the authorities to look into the matter. We do not find any public interest involved in this writ petition.
5. The writ petition is dismissed.
6. We make no order as to costs.
Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE RV