Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Malaiammal vs State Through

Madras High Court|04 October, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This Criminal Original petition is filed to set aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli, in Cr.M.P.No.1803 of 2016 in C.C.No.184 of 2014, dated 20.10.2016, filed under Section 311 of Cr.P.C., to recall and to cross examine P.W.1, P.W.3 and P.W.5.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.
3. The petitioners are the accused Nos.1 to 3 in the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.184 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli, for the alleged offences under Sections 294(b),323,324 and 506(i) I.P.C.
4. Before the lower Court, P.W.1 and P.W.3 were examined in chief on 07.07.2015 and P.W.5 was examined in chief on 28.07.2015. However, the petitioners' counsel before the lower Court did not cross examine the witnesses. A petition was filed on 03.05.2016 to recall three witnesses for cross examination. The said petition was dismissed by the lower Court only on the ground that no explanation was offered by the petitioners for the delay in filing the petition. The witnesses were examined on 07.07.2015 and 28.07.2015. Though the petition was filed on 03.05.2016 without sufficient reasons, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that due to change of counsel, the witnesses were not cross examined immediately.
5. This Court has repeatedly held that the accused should be given fair opportunity during trial. If no opportunity is given to cross examine the three witnesses, it will cause great prejudice to the defence case. In the said circumstances, this Court is of the view that the petitioners can be given one more opportunity to cross examine the three witnesses.
6. Hence, the Criminal Original petition is allowed and the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli, in Cr.M.P.No.1803 of 2016 in C.C.No.184 of 2014, dated 20.10.2016 is set aside and the petition filed by the petitioners under Section 311 of Cr.P.C., in Cr.M.P.No.1803 of 2016 in C.C.No.184 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli, stands allowed. The petitioners are directed to cross examine P.W.1, P.W.3 and P.W.5 on the date when the witnesses are available for cross examination, without asking any further adjournment on any other ground. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli,
2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli Taluk Police Station, Tirunelveli.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Malaiammal vs State Through

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
04 October, 2017