Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Makdoom @ Maksood And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|13 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28690 of 2021 Applicant :- Makdoom @ Maksood And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Ashraf,Bindeshwari Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No.75 of 2021, under Section 3(1)U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act 1986, P.S.Bhot, District Rampur, during pendency of the trial.
It is argued by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. According to the gang chart, the applicants are said to have been involved in one case in which they have already been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.03.2020, copy of the bail order is annexed as Annexure-3 to the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. The applicants are not a member of any gang. There is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future. The applicants are not a previous convict. The applicants are languishing in jail since 17.06.2021 and in case they are enlarged on bail they will not misuse the liberty of bail and co-operate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicants.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the mandate laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22, the Court is of the view that the applicants have made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicants, Makdoom @ Maksood and Junaid, who are involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicants shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicants shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
4. The applicants shall be enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond without sureties till normal functioning of the courts is restored. The accused will furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the court below within a month after normal functioning of the courts are restored.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 13.8.2021 Meenu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Makdoom @ Maksood And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
13 August, 2021
Judges
  • Deepak Verma
Advocates
  • Mohd Ashraf Bindeshwari Prasad